1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:03,034
Ah. The seven-segment display.

2
00:00:03,034 --> 00:00:10,401
Just make an 8 out&nbsp;of some sticks, and then you can represent the Arabic numerals zero through nine just by taking sticks&nbsp;away!

3
00:00:10,401 --> 00:00:13,405
You can even make some letters happen if you’re clever about it.

4
00:00:13,405 --> 00:00:15,287
These things have been around&nbsp;forever:

5
00:00:15,287 --> 00:00:24,815
the earliest known representation of them is in this 1910 patent where
Frank&nbsp;Wood claims to have devised this special monogram arrangement.

6
00:00:24,815 --> 00:00:28,082
Personally I’m a little&nbsp;skeptical that he was the first to think of this,

7
00:00:28,082 --> 00:00:36,176
especially since this earlier patent exists where&nbsp;George Mason devised a
segmented alphanumeric display which is even more complicated,

8
00:00:36,176 --> 00:00:39,463
and creepy&nbsp;looking, but that’s not important to this video.

9
00:00:39,463 --> 00:00:47,043
Going back a century you might find these&nbsp;boxy numbers in 
price signage or perhaps scoreboards at a sports stadium -

10
00:00:47,043 --> 00:00:52,046
anywhere&nbsp;a permanent display which needed to show different numbers made sense.

11
00:00:52,046 --> 00:00:58,723
Usually large so&nbsp;many people could see them,
the segments might be lit with light bulbs (as Frank Wood envisioned)

12
00:00:58,723 --> 00:01:05,880
but they could even be mechanical in nature with differently colored flaps
hiding or revealing&nbsp;the individual segments.

13
00:01:05,880 --> 00:01:09,074
But for many years, they remained pretty obscure.

14
00:01:09,074 --> 00:01:13,556
The seven segment&nbsp;display wouldn't really start to take off until the digital age.

15
00:01:13,556 --> 00:01:19,380
And once we&nbsp;got there and they started spreading,
our old pals at RCA smelled opportunity

16
00:01:19,380 --> 00:01:22,206
so&nbsp;they got out the crayons and took a crack at it.

17
00:01:22,206 --> 00:01:24,594
And these are their handiwork.

18
00:01:24,594 --> 00:01:28,768
They’re called&nbsp;Numitron tubes, and they are terrible.

19
00:01:28,768 --> 00:01:33,121
They’re also rare and frustratingly expensive,
probably&nbsp;because they didn’t sell very well at all.

20
00:01:33,121 --> 00:01:35,155
Because they’re bad!

21
00:01:35,155 --> 00:01:43,834
This is what I can only describe as&nbsp;the crudest possible way
to produce a technically functional seven-segment display for digital&nbsp;devices.

22
00:01:44,319 --> 00:01:48,917
Now you might be able to tell what’s going on in here just by looking at them,

23
00:01:48,917 --> 00:01:57,040
but before I explain their absurdity I want to go back in time 
because by doing so, you’ll&nbsp;understand why these briefly made sense.

24
00:01:57,684 --> 00:01:58,727
Briefly.

25
00:01:59,000 --> 00:02:01,788
Once upon a time, there were computers.

26
00:02:01,788 --> 00:02:04,573
At&nbsp;first very large, very expensive computers,

27
00:02:04,573 --> 00:02:06,730
but we see the potential!

28
00:02:06,730 --> 00:02:15,800
As computing&nbsp;technology got cheaper and microprocessors started showing up in things like scientific&nbsp;equipment, cash registers, control consoles, and whatnot,

29
00:02:15,800 --> 00:02:22,814
we needed displays to allow humans&nbsp;to read and understand 
the data those processors were spitting out.

30
00:02:22,814 --> 00:02:30,812
Of course a general-purpose&nbsp;computer could justify using a CRT monitor
and generating a video signal to display columns and&nbsp;rows of text,

31
00:02:30,812 --> 00:02:34,126
but something like a calculator didn’t need all that.

32
00:02:34,126 --> 00:02:35,926
It just needed to show&nbsp;some numbers.

33
00:02:35,926 --> 00:02:44,664
So, cheap and simple numerical display devices which 
microprocessor-based&nbsp;systems could control became a very hot item.

34
00:02:44,760 --> 00:02:49,032
Over the years equipment manufacturers tried all&nbsp;sorts of ideas.

35
00:02:49,032 --> 00:02:51,470
One of the most famous is the Nixie tube.

36
00:02:51,470 --> 00:02:57,882
These neon-filled tubes produced a&nbsp;glow discharge
around wire cathodes formed in the shape of numerals,

37
00:02:57,882 --> 00:03:02,556
resulting in beautifully&nbsp;legible displays which were readable in many conditions.

38
00:03:02,556 --> 00:03:05,721
But they had a rather huge&nbsp;caveat -

39
00:03:05,721 --> 00:03:09,925
they required high voltage DC to produce that discharge.

40
00:03:09,925 --> 00:03:13,394
As in, around 180V.

41
00:03:13,394 --> 00:03:18,901
That meant that while the tubes were simple,
the circuitry required to drive them was complex.

42
00:03:18,901 --> 00:03:21,154
Not to mention dangerous.

43
00:03:21,154 --> 00:03:26,000
Because of this, Nixies quite naturally attracted plenty of competition.

44
00:03:26,000 --> 00:03:29,939
But, many of its contemporaries shared another of its flaws:

45
00:03:29,939 --> 00:03:34,813
the need for a dedicated&nbsp;output for every character it can display.

46
00:03:34,813 --> 00:03:43,261
Since Nixies use wire-form numerals, a&nbsp;standard Nixie tube 
needs 10 inputs to function: one for each of its cathodes.

47
00:03:43,261 --> 00:03:50,867
But&nbsp;a segmented display which forms numerals by combining different shapes together only needs&nbsp;one output per segment.

48
00:03:50,867 --> 00:03:57,212
That saves on wiring, but it also makes the circuitry
which actually&nbsp;drives the display devices cheaper.

49
00:03:57,212 --> 00:04:06,837
In the early days, dedicated ICs known as BCD decoders would&nbsp;translate
the four bits of binary-coded decimal input they received from a microprocessor

50
00:04:06,837 --> 00:04:10,408
into the correct output to drive a display device.

51
00:04:10,408 --> 00:04:15,792
The internal structure of these decoder&nbsp;chips was quite simple - 
just a few logic gates, really.

52
00:04:15,792 --> 00:04:24,021
But they could be a lot simpler with&nbsp;a seven-segment display compared with
a Nixie tube since there were fewer outputs for it&nbsp;to control.

53
00:04:24,021 --> 00:04:28,781
And, many of the same outputs are active on multiple inputs.

54
00:04:28,781 --> 00:04:32,921
A 2 becomes a&nbsp;3 simply by swapping these two segments,

55
00:04:32,921 --> 00:04:38,414
and that reduces the number of transistors you&nbsp;need
in the chip which makes the chip cheaper.

56
00:04:38,414 --> 00:04:41,729
That’s extremely in the weeds, though&nbsp;- when we get right down to it,

57
00:04:41,729 --> 00:04:49,851
the simple fact was the seven-segment display&nbsp;had too many advantages
over Nixies, Nimos, edge-lit displays, projection displays

58
00:04:49,851 --> 00:04:52,426
and all&nbsp;the other wild ideas that were floating around.

59
00:04:52,426 --> 00:04:57,422
So although they were arguably&nbsp;less readable and more ugly,

60
00:04:57,422 --> 00:05:02,840
they were obviously going to become the standard&nbsp;
display technology for numerical information.

61
00:05:04,475 --> 00:05:07,621
Except - it’s not really a technology.

62
00:05:07,621 --> 00:05:11,603
It’s&nbsp;just a specific graphical representation for numerals.

63
00:05:11,603 --> 00:05:18,011
So using them may simplify control&nbsp;circuitry
and make wiring devices a little easier

64
00:05:18,011 --> 00:05:21,634
but we still have to figure out how to&nbsp;actually make them!

65
00:05:21,634 --> 00:05:23,629
And that wasn’t trivial.

66
00:05:23,629 --> 00:05:30,000
In the late 1960’s,
our technology to make small&nbsp;things light up brightly was quite limited.

67
00:05:30,360 --> 00:05:36,707
We did have teeny little light bulbs, of course,&nbsp;
and we used those in myriad ways (including those projection displays)

68
00:05:36,707 --> 00:05:42,695
but doing that had a ton of drawbacks,
especially visibility in&nbsp;different lighting conditions.

69
00:05:42,695 --> 00:05:50,151
To maximize contrast under bright ambient light,
ideally&nbsp;the glowing element of the display should&nbsp;be directly viewable -

70
00:05:50,151 --> 00:05:53,357
which was one of the Nixie&nbsp;tube’s greatest strengths.

71
00:05:53,357 --> 00:05:59,299
So you might just make a seven-segment nixie tube,
which was indeed a&nbsp;thing (more or less).

72
00:05:59,299 --> 00:06:07,883
But glowing neon cathodes still needed the same high-voltage DC as ordinary Nixies&nbsp;which was annoying and expensive to implement.

73
00:06:07,883 --> 00:06:12,232
Luckily, the vacuum fluorescent display had just&nbsp;popped on the scene.

74
00:06:12,232 --> 00:06:20,942
These devices required low-er voltage than neon discharge tech which was good,&nbsp;
but the tubes themselves were more complex.

75
00:06:20,942 --> 00:06:28,858
These vintage IV-11 tubes might look simple enough
but&nbsp;a closer look reveals there are several layers here.

76
00:06:28,858 --> 00:06:35,224
At the front of the tube is a cathode made&nbsp;
of two heater wires which emit electrons through thermionic emission.

77
00:06:35,224 --> 00:06:45,172
There’s the seven segments&nbsp;forming an 8 at the back, of course,
but look closely and you’ll see that right in front&nbsp;of the 8 is a control grid.

78
00:06:45,172 --> 00:06:52,661
In operation, that grid is positively charged and will absorb&nbsp;
the electrons coming from the cathode wires at the&nbsp;front of the tube.

79
00:06:52,661 --> 00:06:58,257
But the individual segments behind the grid&nbsp;can also be positively charged.

80
00:06:58,257 --> 00:07:04,839
When energized, they also attract electrons and are able to&nbsp;
yank some of them through the control grid.

81
00:07:04,839 --> 00:07:09,858
When those electrons collide
with the phosphors&nbsp;on top of the segments, they glow.

82
00:07:09,858 --> 00:07:11,252
Pretty neat.

83
00:07:11,252 --> 00:07:13,864
But that’s even more complex than nixies!

84
00:07:13,864 --> 00:07:17,903
And&nbsp;for every problem they solved they introduced another.

85
00:07:17,903 --> 00:07:22,179
These tubes didn’t need high voltage,&nbsp;
but they needed two voltages:

86
00:07:22,179 --> 00:07:28,911
a low voltage for the cathode wires
and something around 30 volts&nbsp;for the anodes and control grid.

87
00:07:28,911 --> 00:07:30,925
Better than 180, of course,

88
00:07:30,925 --> 00:07:37,823
but still much higher than the logic&nbsp;circuitry of
whatever you want to put these in, which was typically 5 volts.

89
00:07:37,823 --> 00:07:39,786
And, as you might be&nbsp;able to tell,

90
00:07:39,786 --> 00:07:47,653
these early tubes have pretty poor contrast under even modest ambient lighting&nbsp;since the phosphors are white when unlit.

91
00:07:47,653 --> 00:07:52,111
So, both neon tech and VFDs had their&nbsp;problems.

92
00:07:52,111 --> 00:07:59,676
But we were already building a lot of electronic devices
which needed numerical&nbsp;displays, and there wasn’t time to wait.

93
00:07:59,676 --> 00:08:03,561
So, the fine folks at RCA barfed out an idea.

94
00:08:03,561 --> 00:08:05,254
Here’s my impression of how that went:

95
00:08:06,616 --> 00:08:07,535
What if…

96
00:08:08,452 --> 00:08:10,406
why don’t we just make a weird&nbsp;little light bulb?

97
00:08:10,406 --> 00:08:13,865
[fart noise]
And thus explains the Numitron!

98
00:08:13,865 --> 00:08:19,460
First hitting the&nbsp;market in 1970, these really are just weird little light bulbs…

99
00:08:19,460 --> 00:08:22,010
but with seven filaments.

100
00:08:22,010 --> 00:08:28,799
Each filament is stretched across little pegs on a support board
so they become the segments&nbsp;of a seven-segment display.

101
00:08:28,799 --> 00:08:33,999
Then that assembly got shoved into
a standard 9-pin miniature&nbsp;vacuum tube enclosure.

102
00:08:33,999 --> 00:08:42,897
Just apply power to those pins to light up the right combination&nbsp;of those filaments and you technically have a functional digital display device.

103
00:08:42,897 --> 00:08:51,671
Oh, and this&nbsp;model doesn’t have it, but they were available with a decimal point option which took the form&nbsp;of a tiny little X crossing these four pegs.

104
00:08:51,671 --> 00:08:58,439
These days, of course, the trendy thing to do&nbsp;with weird old display tubes
is to build a clock so that’s what I did.

105
00:08:58,439 --> 00:09:02,683
But in the spirit of the&nbsp;Numitron, I didn’t bother doing it well!

106
00:09:02,683 --> 00:09:04,289
I did the bare minimum.

107
00:09:04,289 --> 00:09:06,100
But it technically works.

108
00:09:06,100 --> 00:09:09,334
I think&nbsp;that was the slogan for the Numitron!

109
00:09:09,505 --> 00:09:15,372
Now, I’m about to be rather unkind to this piece of alleged&nbsp;technology

110
00:09:15,372 --> 00:09:21,772
but before I embark on my tirade where I count all the ways
this is just a terrible&nbsp;terrible product,

111
00:09:21,772 --> 00:09:25,000
I need to admit that I also kind of like them.

112
00:09:25,000 --> 00:09:31,339
I’ve always been fascinated with&nbsp;the idea
of building seven-segment displays out of weird things.

113
00:09:31,339 --> 00:09:36,947
Like, imagine a clock where each&nbsp;segment is a four-foot fluorescent tube.

114
00:09:36,947 --> 00:09:39,933
You could read that thing from miles away!

115
00:09:39,933 --> 00:09:43,337
And, uh, when&nbsp;I was in college,

116
00:09:43,337 --> 00:09:47,863
I built a giant clock where the segments were sections of LED tape.

117
00:09:47,863 --> 00:09:49,529
RGB, of&nbsp;course.

118
00:09:49,529 --> 00:09:53,412
So Numitrons are very much up my alley.

119
00:09:53,412 --> 00:10:01,125
And while today the use of incandescent filaments&nbsp;
in a seven-segment display might seem objectively absurd,

120
00:10:01,125 --> 00:10:04,088
that was in fact the point!

121
00:10:04,088 --> 00:10:09,630
These tubes&nbsp;are dead simple and require nothing special at all to use.

122
00:10:09,630 --> 00:10:13,875
They only need 5V to glow, so they&nbsp;didn’t need their own power supply.

123
00:10:13,875 --> 00:10:19,828
Incandescent filaments are self-regulating, too,
so there’s no&nbsp;need to add current-limiting resistors to the circuit.

124
00:10:19,828 --> 00:10:25,972
And since they were so tiny the segments only consumed&nbsp;about 25 mA each.

125
00:10:25,972 --> 00:10:35,315
This is actually the largest version of the tubes RCA made,
but they don't&nbsp;even consume a watt of power with all segments lit.

126
00:10:35,315 --> 00:10:42,126
The ridiculous simplicity of these meant that you&nbsp;could drive them
directly from a seven-segment BCD decoder chip,

127
00:10:42,126 --> 00:10:47,146
all powered by the same 5V supply
as the rest of your newfangled digital widget.

128
00:10:47,240 --> 00:10:53,000
That would save money in the hardware design,&nbsp;
and since the Numitron itself is so freaking simple,&nbsp;&nbsp;

129
00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:56,137
the display tubes were cheaper than the&nbsp;competition.

130
00:10:56,137 --> 00:10:59,249
So it wasn’t a terrible idea.

131
00:10:59,249 --> 00:11:07,845
But, as you might be able to tell just from looking&nbsp;at them,
the execution of the idea left quite a lot to be desired.

132
00:11:07,845 --> 00:11:12,771
If I could describe these in&nbsp;a word, it would be janky.

133
00:11:12,771 --> 00:11:15,379
Or perhaps slapdash.

134
00:11:15,379 --> 00:11:20,247
Nothing about these feels like a finished product&nbsp;that should exist.

135
00:11:20,247 --> 00:11:22,923
They just look way too crude!

136
00:11:22,923 --> 00:11:30,513
The extremely thin segments lead to them being&nbsp;not very legible,
and the arrangement of those segments is just…

137
00:11:30,513 --> 00:11:31,584
awful.

138
00:11:31,584 --> 00:11:33,769
There’s way too much of a&nbsp;gap between them

139
00:11:33,769 --> 00:11:41,457
and the vertical segments extend uncomfortably beyond
the top and bottom segments&nbsp;which just looks weird.

140
00:11:41,457 --> 00:11:50,841
And they didn’t lean the 8 to accommodate the decimal point at the bottom
so the display&nbsp;is off-center in the tube which is infuriating.

141
00:11:50,841 --> 00:11:53,304
But its problems don’t end there.

142
00:11:53,304 --> 00:11:56,433
Do you notice&nbsp;something wrong about the background?

143
00:11:56,433 --> 00:12:03,624
For reasons that I cannot fathom,
RCA decided to make the support&nbsp;board for the filaments grey.

144
00:12:03,624 --> 00:12:05,259
That was a mistake.

145
00:12:05,259 --> 00:12:08,747
It should be black, or at least as dark as&nbsp;possible.

146
00:12:08,747 --> 00:12:17,698
Because, ya see, any ambient light that hits these things
is going to brighten that background&nbsp;and make the glowing filaments harder to see.

147
00:12:17,698 --> 00:12:21,310
And, if that weren’t enough, even in a pitch-black&nbsp;room

148
00:12:21,310 --> 00:12:26,814
the filaments themselves illuminate that support board
enough to where contrast is reduced,

149
00:12:26,814 --> 00:12:33,130
making the already kind of hard to parse numbers just a little bit harder to identify.

150
00:12:33,130 --> 00:12:39,797
Now, I will&nbsp;give them the benefit of the doubt
and say that there could be some materials reason this isn’t black -

151
00:12:39,797 --> 00:12:45,075
maybe a nice, dark background wouldn’t survive the heat of the glass-sealing process.

152
00:12:45,075 --> 00:12:50,077
But I mean,&nbsp;these VFD tubes have a much darker background so…

153
00:12:50,160 --> 00:12:58,180
And it might be hard to tell but these&nbsp;aren’t even straight -
and I don’t mean&nbsp;my handwork when installing the sockets.

154
00:12:58,180 --> 00:13:05,013
The internal support structure holding the filaments
is leaning noticeably in several of these tubes

155
00:13:05,013 --> 00:13:09,833
so&nbsp;with all the tubes fully seated,
the numbers are slightly crooked

156
00:13:09,833 --> 00:13:16,833
and&nbsp;with multiple tubes you’ll never have a
perfectly aligned display unless you&nbsp;commit to a lot of fiddling.

157
00:13:16,833 --> 00:13:23,281
Honestly, I don’t think anyone at RCA was particularly proud&nbsp;of these things.

158
00:13:23,281 --> 00:13:27,202
I mean, if they were, I would think they would have tried a little harder.

159
00:13:27,202 --> 00:13:28,777
Just look at&nbsp;the datasheet.

160
00:13:28,777 --> 00:13:32,153
These are the other varieties RCA sold.

161
00:13:32,153 --> 00:13:34,578
A plus or minus tube.

162
00:13:34,578 --> 00:13:35,681
Wow.

163
00:13:35,681 --> 00:13:38,683
And a plus or&nbsp;minus 1 tube.

164
00:13:38,683 --> 00:13:41,118
Really workin’ hard over there.

165
00:13:41,118 --> 00:13:45,451
In this promo piece about them, we don’t&nbsp;learn whose idea this was.

166
00:13:45,451 --> 00:13:50,737
We just hear from Robert D. Reichert,
the manager of the&nbsp;whole dang tube design department.

167
00:13:50,737 --> 00:13:56,316
And RCA didn’t bother putting a patent number or&nbsp;
even patent pending on these boxes

168
00:13:56,316 --> 00:13:59,210
which are specifically branded Numitron.

169
00:13:59,210 --> 00:14:02,306
That made&nbsp;me wonder if they even bothered patenting it.

170
00:14:02,306 --> 00:14:06,653
Honestly the only nice thing about these&nbsp;is their name: Numitron.

171
00:14:06,653 --> 00:14:08,275
That’s pretty cool.

172
00:14:08,275 --> 00:14:10,113
But it’s also lazy!

173
00:14:10,113 --> 00:14:14,771
This is literally&nbsp;just numi (short for numerical I guess) and tron.

174
00:14:14,771 --> 00:14:19,881
And back then tron was as infectious a buzzword as AI is today.

175
00:14:19,960 --> 00:14:23,698
I was starting to lose my mind over the origin&nbsp;of these things.

176
00:14:23,698 --> 00:14:26,936
The idea seems simultaneously too obvious

177
00:14:26,936 --> 00:14:30,706
(this write-up in Popular Electronics&nbsp;even says as much)

178
00:14:30,706 --> 00:14:34,361
yet these are also just… not good.

179
00:14:34,361 --> 00:14:39,085
I could not rest until I found the patent and&nbsp;who invented these.

180
00:14:39,085 --> 00:14:41,712
Luckily I did, and here it is.

181
00:14:41,712 --> 00:14:47,414
Apparently these were the brainchild of
Richard&nbsp;Arthur Bonnette and Norman Lee Lindburg.

182
00:14:47,414 --> 00:14:55,497
Now, RCA was a huge research-driven organization&nbsp;back then 
so it’s plausible that these were just two names pulled out of a hat

183
00:14:55,497 --> 00:14:58,275
and I kind&nbsp;of hope it was.

184
00:14:58,275 --> 00:15:01,442
This does not scream quality.

185
00:15:01,442 --> 00:15:08,058
Editor’s note: while looking for a different&nbsp;patent
(the one showing the projection displays which used little light bulbs)

186
00:15:08,058 --> 00:15:11,984
I ran across this&nbsp;patent issued in 1959 to Art Garfunkl -

187
00:15:11,984 --> 00:15:14,443
I mean A. R. Garfinkel.

188
00:15:14,443 --> 00:15:22,180
And… well, sure enough the idea was&nbsp;too obvious
and RCA was not the first to have this idea.

189
00:15:22,180 --> 00:15:25,104
The implementation here is very different,&nbsp;though -

190
00:15:25,104 --> 00:15:31,889
it’s in a flat package (which is gonna come up again later)
but most importantly,&nbsp;if I’m understanding the diagrams correctly,

191
00:15:31,889 --> 00:15:38,429
the filaments are producing light indirectly&nbsp;
and it’s guided towards a mask with small slits at the front.

192
00:15:38,429 --> 00:15:46,073
I’m guessing this concept&nbsp;never made it to production,
and that drawing implies it’s got the widest bezels you’ve&nbsp;ever seen.

193
00:15:46,073 --> 00:15:48,185
But I wanted to throw it in here.

194
00:15:48,185 --> 00:15:53,800
You can see from the datasheet that RCA
was&nbsp;grasping at straws trying to sell these things.

195
00:15:53,800 --> 00:15:59,648
Oh sure, low-voltage operation is very real and&nbsp;
objectively a good differentiator.

196
00:15:59,648 --> 00:16:03,812
But “void of clutter” is clearly a dig at Nixies,

197
00:16:03,812 --> 00:16:13,257
and the&nbsp;whole “oh, it’s incandescent with a wide spectral output so you can use color filters to obtain&nbsp;a display of any desired color” is true,

198
00:16:13,257 --> 00:16:14,923
but a stretch.

199
00:16:14,923 --> 00:16:18,345
I mean, sure, but good luck with blue.

200
00:16:18,345 --> 00:16:26,196
RCA designed them to last 100,000 hours and, well,
that’s only gonna be possible if the filaments&nbsp;burn quite dimly.

201
00:16:26,196 --> 00:16:32,900
So they’re not producing much light towards the blue end of the spectrum&nbsp;and a blue filter will really cut their output.

202
00:16:32,900 --> 00:16:38,582
Now, to be fair the tubes can be a lot&nbsp;
brighter than they appear in this clock.

203
00:16:38,582 --> 00:16:45,834
They’re power-limited here thanks to the&nbsp;BCD decoders I had 
which are not capable of passing 25 mA.

204
00:16:45,834 --> 00:16:51,143
If I apply 5 volts directly to a&nbsp;tube, we can see that it can get this bright.

205
00:16:51,143 --> 00:16:52,811
Which is honestly impressive!

206
00:16:52,811 --> 00:16:57,770
That’s definitely brighter than a&nbsp;Nixie tube,
and whiter than I was expecting.

207
00:16:57,770 --> 00:17:04,988
But this also really reveals how much the filaments&nbsp;
are brightening the background and reducing contrast.

208
00:17:04,988 --> 00:17:07,501
That really shouldn’t be grey.

209
00:17:07,501 --> 00:17:10,397
I mean&nbsp;you didn’t need a rocket surgeon to tell you that.

210
00:17:11,000 --> 00:17:14,835
While RCA didn’t seem to try very hard here,

211
00:17:14,835 --> 00:17:18,404
the concept was valuable enough to attract clones.

212
00:17:18,404 --> 00:17:23,889
There are plenty of variants&nbsp;available that were made in the USSR,
but those are even worse!

213
00:17:23,889 --> 00:17:28,840
These IV-9 tubes have&nbsp;filaments that sag under their own weight.

214
00:17:29,600 --> 00:17:35,440
Later, incandescent seven-segment displays just&nbsp;
like Numitrons but in flat packages appeared,&nbsp;&nbsp;

215
00:17:35,440 --> 00:17:40,738
and for some reason I have a memory that they&nbsp;
were common in gas pumps for a brief time

216
00:17:40,738 --> 00:17:43,930
but literally I have no idea why that’s in&nbsp;my head.

217
00:17:43,930 --> 00:17:46,172
I just read it somewhere somewhen.

218
00:17:46,172 --> 00:17:49,764
Those clones were all short-lived, though,&nbsp;
just like the Numitron,

219
00:17:49,764 --> 00:17:53,449
because of a little thing called the light-emitting diode.

220
00:17:53,449 --> 00:18:01,397
They had already been invented by the time RCA got the Numitron out the door,
but&nbsp;they were extremely expensive in 1970.

221
00:18:01,397 --> 00:18:10,748
And, the first seven-segment displays which used&nbsp;LEDs were tiny things where each segment was actually multiple LEDs on a tiny little chip,

222
00:18:10,748 --> 00:18:17,597
and they relied on magnification lenses to make
the tiny glowing digital dots appear larger.

223
00:18:17,597 --> 00:18:21,212
That’s why the Numitron made sense to use.

224
00:18:21,212 --> 00:18:26,202
But it didn’t take long at all for LEDs to get cheap,&nbsp;
and once they did?

225
00:18:26,202 --> 00:18:28,461
The Numitron was doomed.

226
00:18:28,461 --> 00:18:34,463
LED packages like this quickly became the&nbsp;
defacto standard for seven-segment displays.

227
00:18:34,463 --> 00:18:41,891
These are much like those really early and&nbsp;large displays where ordinary light bulbs were stuck down holes with lenses on the&nbsp;front,

228
00:18:41,891 --> 00:18:46,086
but miniaturized by replacing the light bulbs with tiny LEDs.

229
00:18:46,086 --> 00:18:54,656
Those LEDs are&nbsp;firing up at small lenses embedded in epoxy resin
and that forms an incredibly rugged&nbsp;and simple structure.

230
00:18:54,656 --> 00:19:02,707
The lens shapes can also be tweaked for maximum legibility,
and&nbsp;resin’s a lot easier to deal with than glass, too.

231
00:19:02,707 --> 00:19:08,161
So once production lines for these things&nbsp;
spun up the Numitron just looked ridiculous.

232
00:19:08,161 --> 00:19:11,354
And let’s not forget the vacuum&nbsp;fluorescent display.

233
00:19:11,354 --> 00:19:15,505
These things are still in use today - in fact there’s&nbsp;one in my stove.

234
00:19:15,505 --> 00:19:21,949
The single-digit tube form factor found here became
just as&nbsp;ridiculous as the Numitron before long,

235
00:19:21,949 --> 00:19:26,918
but its the problems with contrast in ambient&nbsp;light
were easily fixed with filtering

236
00:19:26,918 --> 00:19:33,017
and soon we learned how to make VFDs flat and pack&nbsp;
them with hundreds of individual segments.

237
00:19:33,017 --> 00:19:41,443
You might have 8 seven-segement displays&nbsp;all in a single package for a calculator,
or even dot-matrix alphanumeric displays.

238
00:19:41,443 --> 00:19:49,244
Through multiplexing, a technique where the entire display is broken up
into several sections&nbsp;addressed one at a time in rapid succession,

239
00:19:49,244 --> 00:19:55,963
we could make very complicated and very customizable&nbsp;
displays featuring custom graphics and multiple&nbsp;colors,

240
00:19:55,963 --> 00:20:00,981
all with excellent readability,&nbsp;longevity, and simple control circuits.

241
00:20:00,981 --> 00:20:04,485
Oh, right and then there was the liquid-crystal&nbsp;display.

242
00:20:04,485 --> 00:20:07,981
Which, funnily enough, was invented by George Heilmeier

243
00:20:07,981 --> 00:20:09,763
at RCA!

244
00:20:09,763 --> 00:20:11,952
And before the Numitron!

245
00:20:12,646 --> 00:20:20,119
It took quite a while to become viable, though,
and RCA’s first version used a concept called&nbsp;dynamic scattering mode,

246
00:20:20,119 --> 00:20:21,723
and wasn’t super great.

247
00:20:21,723 --> 00:20:27,884
Other innovators improved upon it over the years,&nbsp;
and I’m really only including it as a footnote since it wasn’t self-illuminating

248
00:20:27,884 --> 00:20:34,510
and it was not&nbsp;quite a contemporary of the Numitron,
at least not ones that actually worked well.

249
00:20:34,510 --> 00:20:38,455
But once we&nbsp;figured them out the Numitron looked even sillier.

250
00:20:38,455 --> 00:20:41,853
Still, I can’t help but admire the&nbsp;Numitron.

251
00:20:41,853 --> 00:20:50,379
It’s perhaps the perfect example of the phrase
“so crazy it just might&nbsp;work” distilled into a product.

252
00:20:50,379 --> 00:20:53,888
Trouble was, while it did technically work,

253
00:20:53,888 --> 00:21:00,249
its advantages&nbsp;became irrelevant
approximately seven minutes after RCA brought it to market.

254
00:21:00,249 --> 00:21:07,673
Of course that’s&nbsp;not entirely true, but I am all but certain that device manufacturers,
when shopping for display&nbsp;technologies,

255
00:21:07,673 --> 00:21:13,020
looked at how poorly these render numbers
and how jankily they were constructed

256
00:21:13,020 --> 00:21:18,303
and quickly concluded they’d rather pay more for something a little more polished.

257
00:21:18,303 --> 00:21:22,646
Slapping&nbsp;these in your digital device screamed cheap.

258
00:21:22,646 --> 00:21:25,493
If there’s a lesson we can learn from the&nbsp;Numitron,

259
00:21:25,493 --> 00:21:32,552
it’s probably that there are times
where the simplest possible option really is&nbsp;too simple.

260
00:21:32,552 --> 00:21:37,949
If it had a little more time in the oven
and RCA tried executing it a little better,

261
00:21:37,949 --> 00:21:40,814
maybe it would have seen more success.

262
00:21:40,814 --> 00:21:46,302
But it was always going to be stuck
with the shapes&nbsp;you can make with a filament.

263
00:21:46,302 --> 00:21:49,642
In other words, thin, straight lines.

264
00:21:49,642 --> 00:21:55,511
With every other display&nbsp;technology offering
much more legible characters and even custom glyphs,

265
00:21:55,511 --> 00:22:02,587
the Numitron would never&nbsp;be able to branch out
beyond seven-segment and maybe alphanumeric displays.

266
00:22:02,587 --> 00:22:06,021
But I’ll bet those&nbsp;would look even worse than this.

267
00:22:06,021 --> 00:22:10,836
But hey, at least they managed to get it to market when it actually made some sense.

268
00:22:10,836 --> 00:22:13,045
Unlike that Videodisc player.

269
00:22:13,045 --> 00:22:14,525
Oh look, LEDs!

270
00:22:15,467 --> 00:22:18,013
♫ slapdashedly smooth jazz ♫

271
00:22:19,128 --> 00:22:20,334
I have to record that line again.

272
00:22:20,334 --> 00:22:23,148
Ignore all&nbsp;the continuity errors....

273
00:22:23,148 --> 00:22:24,396
It’s a running clock.

274
00:22:24,396 --> 00:22:26,035
For your benefit…

275
00:22:26,035 --> 00:22:28,600
[waits until the hour rollover]

276
00:22:31,548 --> 00:22:32,452
OK

277
00:22:32,452 --> 00:22:36,119
…and, since the Numitron itself is so dang simple,

278
00:22:36,119 --> 00:22:38,382
the tubes werech cheap chchpbbt.

279
00:22:40,141 --> 00:22:40,908
Fell apart.

280
00:22:40,908 --> 00:22:44,945
The earliest known representation of them is this eh debekadababa

281
00:22:44,945 --> 00:22:47,478
Ah, the seven-segment display.

282
00:22:47,478 --> 00:22:49,481
Make an aight… what?

283
00:22:49,481 --> 00:22:54,563
The use of incandescent filaments in a seven-segment display might&nbsp;seem objectibely…

284
00:22:54,563 --> 00:22:55,863
objectibely?

285
00:22:55,863 --> 00:23:00,731
Because of this, Nixies quite naturally&nbsp;attracted plenty of commetition.

286
00:23:00,731 --> 00:23:03,425
But, I’ve… mmm.

287
00:23:05,209 --> 00:23:08,198
RCA really did some numbers here, didn't they?

288
00:23:08,198 --> 00:23:11,004
Or should I say, they really did a number on themselves?

289
00:23:11,004 --> 00:23:14,194
Perhaps this is the product that signaled the beginning of the end for RCA.

290
00:23:14,194 --> 00:23:17,039
Imagine if they had stuck Numitron tubes in the Selectivision players though.

291
00:23:17,039 --> 00:23:20,894
Maybe that would have sold it!

